Phase 1/2 multicenter trial of acalabrutinib in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Acalabrutinib studies have limited Asian participation. This phase 1/2 study (NCT03932331) assessed acalabrutinib in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Overall, 34 patients were enrolled. Most patients were men (88%); median age was 63 years and 59% had ≥3 prior treatments. Median treatment duration was 14 months (range, 1-24). Any-grade adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 85.3% and 44.1% of patients, respectively. AEs causing treatment discontinuation were aplastic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal infection (n = 1 each). Fatal AEs occurred in 2 patients (aplastic anemia and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [n = 1 each]). BICR-assessed ORR was 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.5, 93.2); 12 (35.3%) patients achieved complete response. Estimated 12-month OS was 84.5% (95% CI: 66.6, 93.3). Acalabrutinib yielded tolerable safety and high response rates in Chinese patients with R/R MCL.

5-HT1F agonists.

5-Hydroxytryptamine (HT)/serotonin receptor agonism has been a long-recognized property of triptan medications, and more recently, the study and development of medications with selective binding to the 1F receptor subtype have been explored. While the exact mechanism contributing to decreased symptoms of an acute migraine attack remains unclear, selective 5-HT1F agonists have demonstrated clinical efficacy with lasmiditan as the only approved medication from this class to date. Lasmiditan lacks vasoconstrictive properties, giving it utility in specific patient populations in whom triptans should be avoided. Availability, central nervous system (CNS) side effects, and 8-hour driving restriction may affect its clinical use.

Time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line ibrutinib or acalabrutinib.

Aim: To investigate real-world time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line (1L) ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. Materials & methods: US specialty pharmacy electronic medical records (21/11/2018-30/4/2022) were used; patients initiated 1L on/after 21/11/2019 (acalabrutinib approval). Results: Among 710 patients receiving ibrutinib, 5.9% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 9.2 months); among 373 patients receiving acalabrutinib, 7.5% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 5.9 months). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, acalabrutinib-treated patients were 89% more likely to initiate next treatment (hazard ratio = 1.89; p = 0.016). Conclusion: This study addresses a need for real-world comparative effectiveness between 1L ibrutinib and acalabrutinib and shows that next treatment (a clinically meaningful measure for real-world progression) occurred less frequently with 1L ibrutinib.

Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are oral medications taken once-daily and twice-daily, respectively. They are recommended as initial treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of these treatments as initial treatment for CLL. To meet this goal, real-world US specialty pharmacy electronic medical records between 11/21/2018­4/30/2022 were used. Patients treated with ibrutinib or acalabrutinib as initial treatment for CLL were studied. Treatment had to be started on or after the date of acalabrutinib approval for CLL (11/21/2019). Time to next treatment was used to estimate real-world disease progression. It was defined as the time from the initiation of initial treatment with ibrutinib or acalabrutinib to the initiation of a next treatment. Study results showed that patients were observed for a median of up to 1.5 years. Over this period, next treatment was more likely for acalabrutinib (7.5%) compared with ibrutinib (5.9%). After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics, next treatment was 89% more likely with acalabrutinib than ibrutinib. This study addresses a need to compare the effectiveness of initial treatment with ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in the real-world. It helps better contextualize results from clinical trial data and shows that next treatment occurred less frequently with ibrutinib.

[To compare the efficacy and incidence of severe hematological adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia].

Objective: To analyze and compare therapy responses, outcomes, and incidence of severe hematologic adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) . Methods: Data of patients with chronic phase CML diagnosed between January 2006 and November 2022 from 76 centers, aged ≥18 years, and received initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy within 6 months after diagnosis in China were retrospectively interrogated. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce the bias of the initial TKI selection, and the therapy responses and outcomes of patients receiving initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy were compared. Results: A total of 4 833 adult patients with CML receiving initial imatinib (n=4 380) or flumatinib (n=453) therapy were included in the study. In the imatinib cohort, the median follow-up time was 54 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-85] months, and the 7-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.2%, 88.4%, 78.3%, and 63.0%, respectively. The 7-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 71.8%, 93.0%, and 96.9%, respectively. With the median follow-up of 18 (IQR, 13-25) months in the flumatinib cohort, the 2-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.4%, 86.5%, 58.4%, and 46.6%, respectively. The 2-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 80.1%, 95.0%, and 99.5%, respectively. The PSM analysis indicated that patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had significantly higher cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) and higher probabilities of FFS than those receiving the initial imatinib therapy (all P<0.001), whereas the PFS (P=0.230) and OS (P=0.268) were comparable between the two cohorts. The incidence of severe hematologic adverse events (grade≥Ⅲ) was comparable in the two cohorts. Conclusion: Patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had higher cumulative incidences of therapy responses and higher probability of FFS than those receiving initial imatinib therapy, whereas the incidence of severe hematologic adverse events was comparable between the two cohorts.

Topical Roflumilast for Plaque Psoriasis.

Roflumilast is a highly selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Topical roflumilast 0.3% cream, approved by the US FDA and Health Canada for use in adolescents and adults, has proven efficacy and tolerability. It is non-steroidal, administered once-daily, and highly potent, with a unique delivery formulation. It can be used on most body areas, including the sensitive intertriginous regions and face. Herein, we review the safety and efficacy of roflumilast 0.3% cream, as demonstrated in clinical trials.

Protocol of Tecopox study: a multicentre, open-label, double-arm trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral tecovirimat therapy for patients with smallpox or monkeypox.

INTRODUCTION: Monkeypox was originally endemic locally in West Africa; however, outbreaks in non-endemic countries have been recognised since May 2022. The effectiveness of tecovirimat has been estimated against smallpox, which belongs to the same Orthopoxvirus genus as monkeypox. Thus, tecovirimat is expected to be effective against monkeypox. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral tecovirimat therapy for patients with smallpox and monkeypox and to prepare a scheme for oral tecovirimat use in Japan. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This nationwide, multicentre, non-randomised, open-label, double-arm study will involve viral examination of the blood, throat swabs, urine and skin lesions, performed periodically. Participants will freely decide whether to participate in an administered group (supportive treatment plus oral tecovirimat) or a non-administered group (only supportive treatment). Tecovirimat will be administered for 14 days. To ensure that financial problems do not preclude participation in the study, the research fund will cover the cost of tecovirimat and basic hospitalisation fees. The primary endpoint is the percentage of patients with negative PCR results (cycle threshold value ≥40) for skin lesion specimens at 14 days after inclusion in the study. Secondary endpoints include mortality at 14 and 30 days, viral load in each sample, duration of fever and adverse events. The sample size is estimated to be 50 patients with monkeypox or smallpox. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. This study was approved by the Certified Review Board of National Center for Global Health and Medicine and published in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and/or in presentations at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031220169.

Topical roflumilast for the treatment of psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: New non-steroidal topical agents are needed for the treatment of psoriasis. Roflumilast cream 0.3% is a once daily phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor that was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adolescents and adults. It is indicated for use on all body surfaces including intertriginous areas. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about roflumilast cream for the treatment of psoriasis, highlighting its efficacy and safety profile from published clinical trials. Roflumilast's mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic profile are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Positive results were reported across trials with 48% of patients treated with roflumilast achieving an Investigator Global Assessment score of clear or almost clear at 8 weeks in phase III studies. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and few application-site reactions were reported among participants. Unique advantages of the cream are its success in treating intertriginous areas and its ability to reduce symptoms of itch, results of which may significantly improve quality of life for patients. In the future, real-world data and active comparator trials with existing non-steroidal agents are needed to better understand roflumilast's place in the current treatment landscape.

Tazemetostat for tumors harboring SMARCB1/SMARCA4 or EZH2 alterations: results from NCI-COG pediatric MATCH APEC1621C.

BACKGROUND: National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice assigns patients aged 1-21 years with refractory solid tumors, brain tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase II trials of molecularly targeted therapies based on detection of predefined genetic alterations. Patients whose tumors harbored EZH2 mutations or loss of SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 by immunohistochemistry were treated with EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat. METHODS: Patients received tazemetostat for 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (max 26 cycles). The primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and tolerability of tazemetostat. RESULTS: Twenty patients (median age = 5 years) enrolled, all evaluable for response and toxicities. The most frequent diagnoses were atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (n = 8) and malignant rhabdoid tumor (n = 4). Actionable alterations consisted of SMARCB1 loss (n = 16), EZH2 mutation (n = 3), and SMARCA4 loss (n = 1). One objective response was observed in a patient with non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis with SMARCA4 loss (26 cycles, 1200 mg/m2/dose twice daily). Four patients with SMARCB1 loss had a best response of stable disease: epithelioid sarcoma (n = 2), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (n = 1), and renal medullary carcinoma (n = 1). Six-month progression-free survival was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.7% to 55.2%) and 6-month overall survival was 45% (95% CI = 23.1% to 64.7%). Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with prior tazemetostat reports. CONCLUSIONS: Although tazemetostat did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint in this population of refractory pediatric tumors (objective response rate = 5%, 90% CI = 1% to 20%), 25% of patients with multiple histologic diagnoses experienced prolonged stable disease of 6 months and over (range = 9-26 cycles), suggesting a potential effect of tazemetostat on disease stabilization.

Quality-adjusted survival time without symptoms or toxicity of acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Acalabrutinib monotherapy (A) and acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab (A + O) demonstrated improved efficacy and safety versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (C + O) among treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) in the ELEVATE-TN trial. The relative risk-benefit at a median follow-up of 47 months was assessed using Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity (Q-TWiST) methodology. Patient data were partitioned into 3 states: time with toxicity (TOX); time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST); and time after relapse (REL). Mean Q-TWiST was estimated by summing the mean time in each state, multiplied by its respective utility weight. Patients receiving A or A + O experienced significantly longer Q-TWiST versus C + O when toxicity was defined as grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) (41.79 vs 34.56 months; 42.07 vs 34.56 months) and grade 2-4 AEs (35.07 vs 30.64 months; 34.21 vs 30.64 months). Overall, patients with treatment-naive CLL treated with A or A + O experienced significant gains in Q-TWiST compared with C + O.

Pharmacovigilance analysis of cardiac risks associated with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs) can be associated with several cardiac risks. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was conducted based on records from a large spontaneous reporting database, the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, for cardiac events reported for several BTKI agents. Reporting odds ratio and information components based on statistical shrinkage transformation were utilized to measure disproportionality. RESULTS: The final number of records for BTKI-related cardiac events was 10 320. Death or life-threatening events occurred in 17.63% of all associated cardiac records. Significant reporting was captured between BTKI (total/specific) and cardiac events, with the strongest association for ibrutinib. A total of 47 positive signals were evacuated for ibrutinib, with atrial fibrillation being the most commonly reported one. Concomitantly, cardiac failure, congestive, cardiac disorder, arrhythmia, pericardial effusion, and atrial flutter were also noticed for relatively stronger signal and disproportionality. Atrial fibrillation was over-reported in the three groups (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib), and acalabrutinib had statistically significant lower reporting compared with ibrutinib. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, or zanubrutinib might increase the chance of cardiac complications, with ibrutinib posing the highest risk. The type of cardiotoxicity involved in ibrutinib was highly variable.

The Safety and Efficacy of Roflumilast Cream 0.15% and 0.05% in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Proof of Concept Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) need safe and effective topical treatments. OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of roflumilast cream in patients with mild to moderate AD. METHODS: In this phase 2, proof of concept trial, patients (N=136) aged ≥12 years with AD were randomized to once-daily roflumilast cream 0.15%, roflumilast cream 0.05%, or vehicle cream for 4 weeks. Absolute change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at week 4 (primary endpoint), percentage change and responder rates, Validated Investigator Global Assessment-AD (vIGA-AD), and safety were assessed. RESULTS: At week 4, mean absolute changes in EASI were −6.4 (P=0.097 vs vehicle), −6.0 (P=0.356), and −4.8 with roflumilast 0.15%, roflumilast 0.05%, and vehicle, respectively. Significant improvements were observed for percentage change from baseline in EASI, patients reaching 75% improvement in EASI, and patients achieving vIGA-AD score of “clear” or “almost clear.” Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 2 (2.2%) patients receiving roflumilast (mild rash and moderate application site pain). Only 1 (1.1%) patient receiving roflumilast discontinued study/drug due to an AE. LIMITATIONS: Small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results support additional larger clinical trials of roflumilast cream to assess its potential as a once-daily, nonsteroidal topical AD treatment. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier NCT03916081 J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(2):139-147. doi:10.36849/JDD.7295.

Effect of Roflumilast Cream vs Vehicle Cream on Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: The DERMIS-1 and DERMIS-2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Importance: Once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.3%, a potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated in a phase 2b trial of patients with psoriasis. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of roflumilast cream, 0.3%, applied once daily for 8 weeks in 2 trials of patients with plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trials (DERMIS-1 [trial 1; n = 439] and DERMIS-2 [trial 2; n = 442]) were conducted at 40 centers (trial 1) and 39 centers (trial 2) in the US and Canada between December 9, 2019, and November 16, 2020, and between December 9, 2019, and November 23, 2020, respectively. Patients aged 2 years or older with plaque psoriasis involving 2% to 20% of body surface area were enrolled. The dates of final follow-up were November 20, 2020, and November 23, 2020, for trial 1 and trial 2, respectively. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive roflumilast cream, 0.3% (trial 1: n = 286; trial 2: n = 290), or vehicle cream (trial 1: n = 153; trial 2: n = 152) once daily for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) success (clear or almost clear status plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline [score range, 0-4]) at week 8, analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by site, baseline IGA score, and intertriginous involvement. There were 9 secondary outcomes, including intertriginous IGA success, 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale score of 4 or higher at baseline achieving 4-point reduction (WI-NRS success) at week 8 (scale: 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst imaginable itch]; minimum clinically important difference, 4 points). Results: Among 881 participants (mean age, 47.5 years; 320 [36.3%] female), mean IGA scores in trial 1 were 2.9 [SD, 0.52] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.45] for vehicle and in trial 2 were 2.9 [SD, 0.48] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.47]) for vehicle. Statistically significantly greater percentages of roflumilast-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients had IGA success at week 8 (trial 1: 42.4% vs 6.1%; difference, 39.6% [95% CI, 32.3%-46.9%]; trial 2: 37.5% vs 6.9%; difference, 28.9% [95% CI, 20.8%-36.9%]; P < .001 for both). Of 9 secondary end points, statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast vs vehicle were observed for 8 in trial 1 and 9 in trial 2, including intertriginous IGA success (71.2% vs 13.8%; difference, 66.5% [95% CI, 47.1%-85.8%] and 68.1% vs 18.5%; difference, 51.6% [95% CI, 29.3%-73.8%]; P < .001 for both), 75% reduction in PASI score (41.6% vs 7.6%; difference, 36.1% [95% CI, 28.5%-43.8%] and 39.0% vs 5.3%; difference, 32.4% [95% CI, 24.9%-39.8%]; P < .001 for both), WI-NRS success (67.5% vs 26.8%; difference, 42.6% [95% CI, 31.3%-53.8%] and 69.4% vs 35.6%; difference, 30.2% [95% CI, 18.2%-42.2%]; P < .001 for both). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 25.2% with roflumilast vs 23.5% with vehicle in trial 1 and 25.9% with roflumilast vs 18.4% with vehicle in trial 2. The incidence of serious adverse events was 0.7% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 1 and 0% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 2. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, treatment with roflumilast cream, 0.3%, compared with vehicle cream resulted in better clinical status at 8 weeks. Further research is needed to assess efficacy compared with other active treatments and to assess longer-term efficacy and safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04211363, NCT04211389.

Risk of bleeding associated with BTK inhibitor monotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The bleeding risk associated with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) monotherapy remains to be understood. This systematic review aims to evaluate BTKi monotherapy related bleeding risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched up to 5 December 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BTKi monotherapy with control drugs, or comparing different BTKi monotherapies. RESULTS: 10 studies with 3139 patients were included. Ibrutinib (vs. control drugs) significantly increased the risk of overall bleeding and major bleeding (RR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.80-2.75, P < 0.00001; RR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.18, P = 0.04, respectively). Acalabrutinib (vs. control drugs) had a significantly increased overall bleeding risk (RR = 3.45, 95% CI 2.39-4.99, p < 0.00001). A significant difference was found in overall bleeding between ibrutinib and acalabrutinib (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.11-1.64, P = 0.002). Compared to zanubrutinib, ibrutinib tended to increase the risk of major bleeding (RR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.57-4.18, P = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib (vs. control drugs) have a higher risk of bleeding and overall bleeding, respectively. Limited evidence suggests that ibrutinib (vs. acalabrutinib) significantly increases overall bleeding risk, but the differences are not observed in other comparisons.

Relative efficacy of lasmiditan versus rimegepant and ubrogepant as acute treatments for migraine: network meta-analysis findings.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of head-to-head trials, comprehensive evidence comparing onset of efficacy of novel agents for acute treatment of migraine is lacking. This study aimed to explore the relative efficacy of lasmiditan (serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine] 1F receptor agonist) versus rimegepant and ubrogepant (calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists) for the acute oral treatment of migraine through network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Data included in the NMA were identified through a systematic literature search (conducted April 2018, updated May/December 2020) of phase II-IV, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with chronic/episodic migraine with/without aura. Treatments included: lasmiditan 50, 100, 200 mg; rimegepant 75 mg; ubrogepant 25, 50, 100 mg. Pairwise treatment comparisons from Bayesian fixed-effect/random-effects NMA, adjusted by baseline risk where appropriate, were conducted. Comparisons were reported as odds ratios with 95% credible intervals. Early-onset efficacy endpoints included: pain freedom at 2 hours and pain relief at 1 and 2 hours. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) profiles were summarised. Heterogeneity and inconsistency in the network were explored; sensitivity analyses investigated robustness of findings. RESULTS: Across 12 RCTs included in the base case, females represented >80% of included patients (mean age 37.9-45.7 years). Odds of achieving both pain freedom and pain relief at 2 hours were higher with lasmiditan 100 and 200 mg versus rimegepant 75 mg and ubrogepant 25 and 50 mg. Results for pain relief at 1 hour were consistent with those at 2 hours, but fewer comparisons were available. There were no statistically significant differences between lasmiditan 50 mg and ubrogepant or rimegepant for any outcome. Sensitivity analyses were in the same direction as base case analyses. Most commonly reported ADRs (incidence ≥2%) were: dizziness, fatigue, paraesthesia, sedation, nausea/vomiting and muscle weakness with lasmiditan; nausea with rimegepant; and nausea, somnolence and dry mouth with ubrogepant. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy findings of this indirect comparison indicate that lasmiditan 100 mg or 200 mg might be an appropriate acute treatment option for patients with migraine seeking a fast onset of action. Differently from rimegepant and ubrogepant, lasmiditan use is associated with mainly neurological events, which are mostly mild or moderate in severity and self-limiting. 350/350 words.